Outrage Culture
Feb. 6th, 2020 08:57 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
yakov_a_jerkovХорошее видео с трампистами, до глубины души возмущенными безобразным поступком Пелоси.
"Shredding a little two-year old" -- that takes the cake.
"Shredding a little two-year old" -- that takes the cake.
Here are the nominees for Best Performance in Fake Outrage Over Pelosi’s Speech Rip. #TheOutragees pic.twitter.com/h4z9ewdzud
— The Daily Show (@TheDailyShow) February 6, 2020
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 06:04 am (UTC)(a)Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b)Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.
no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 06:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 06:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 06:18 am (UTC)Для расследования shredding a little two-year old нужна не юридическая комиссия, а нечто серьезнее.
no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 06:22 am (UTC)Ну а если уж о "бедной разорванной девочке" речь зашла, так там не только она одна была
no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 08:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 05:26 pm (UTC)Тем не менее, отрадно наблюдать что вы больше не отвечаете по существу и не пытаетесть аргументировать. Вы стали плоским ретранслятором пропаганды.
С чем я вас и поздравляю.
no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-02-08 12:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 08:34 pm (UTC)https://youtu.be/5j0nnn16Vu8?t=12
no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 08:37 pm (UTC)Весь абсурд ситуации в том, что трамписты возмущаются чьим-то (якобы) хамством.
no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 10:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 11:36 pm (UTC)Копия общедоступного доклада не является "казенной бумагой", которую нельзя рвать.
Что касается Трампа, то он нарушил закон, конфисковав и разорвав записи переводчика после встречи с Путиным. В Конгрессе пытались этот эпизод расследовать, но наткнулись на очередной cover-up.
President Trump is prohibited from disposing of records unless they "no longer have administrative, historical, informational, or evidentiary value," and he must first obtain the written views of the Archivist of the United States before disposing of these records.
On March 21, 2019, White House Counsel Pat Cipollone sent a letter in response to our request, but it incorrectly asserted that all of our questions had been "fully" addressed in previous correspondence. In fact, the White House has not answered any of these questions. The three letters cited by the White House Counsel as examples of "prior responsive letters" were sent 20 months, 16 months, and 2 months before our February 21 , 2019, request.
The Presidential Records Act is at the core of the Oversight Committee's legislative and oversight jurisdiction, and I had hoped that the White House would cooperate voluntarily with this inquiry. Instead, the White House has disregarded these legitimate congressional inquiries and dissembled about basic facts. These actions do not serve the interests of the American people, and they obstruct and frustrate the Committee's review.
For these reasons, the Committee reiterates its request that you provide by July 8, 2019, the information requested in our letter on February 21, 2019:
1. Did President Trump take possession of the interpreter's notes from the Hamburg meeting with Vladimir Putin on July 7, 2017? If so:
a. Did President Trump destroy or alter the interpreter's notes?
b. What steps did President Trump take to preserve the interpreter's notes?
c. Who currently has possession, custody, or control of the interpreter's notes?
d. Have the interpreter's notes or a copy been provided to the State Department?
https://oversight.house.gov/news/press-releases/committee-seeks-information-and-interview-on-white-house-compliance-with-federal
no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 08:50 am (UTC)(a)Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
Обратите внимание на то что я выделил жирным шрифтом для вас. Так вот.
Trump handed Pelosi a copy of the speech. He didn’t file this copy with any official—clerk or otherwise—whose job it is to make sure such documents are collected, recorded and physically and legally protected. The president gave Pelosi a copy of his address as a memento of sorts. This action wasn’t an official deposit.
И знаете что, борменталь. Люди которые разгоняют эту волну с "порваными девочками" все эти Higbie и Kirk(и), они не дураки. Они знают что делают, поэтому в их заявлениях выделенных жирным шрифтом кусков нет. Они их пропустили. Зачем зря публику волновать. Пусть кушает с лопаты что дают. А вы процитировали все. Потому что в отличие от этих возмущенных республиканцев, вы -- и есть их публика.
no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 04:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 05:22 pm (UTC)Вы идиот?
no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 08:00 pm (UTC)Why did I presume you an idiot?
Because part of my comment written in English (which you blamed as an ignorant attempt) in fact is not mine at all. It is direct quotation from lawandcrime.com where fact-check analysis of Pelosi performance was published.
https://lawandcrime.com/legal-analysis/no-nancy-pelosi-didnt-break-the-law-when-destroying-trumps-speech/
I have no idea who you are but it is funny to observe how you mock Colin Kalmbacher (Doctor of Law, Editor, Law&Crime) for bad English. I feel sorry for you, bro.
А теперь давайте вернемся к "вы идиот".
По правилам русского языка, тире не ставится если подлежащее выражено личным местоимением, а сказуемое – именительным падежом существительного.
Всего хорошего.
no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 07:55 pm (UTC)Известный тем, что скрупулезно сохраняет все бумаги и ни в коем случае не позволит себе чего-нибудь порвать.
Under the Presidential Records Act, the White House must preserve all memos, letters, emails and papers that the president touches, sending them to the National Archives for safekeeping as historical records.
But White House aides realized early on that they were unable to stop Trump from ripping up paper after he was done with it and throwing it in the trash or on the floor, according to people familiar with the practice. Instead, they chose to clean it up for him, in order to make sure that the president wasn’t violating the law.
Staffers had the fragments of paper collected from the Oval Office as well as the private residence and send it over to records management across the street from the White House for Lartey and his colleagues to reassemble.
“We got Scotch tape, the clear kind,” Lartey recalled in an interview. “You found pieces and taped them back together and then you gave it back to the supervisor.” The restored papers would then be sent to the National Archives to be properly filed away.
Lartey said the papers he received included newspaper clips on which Trump had scribbled notes, or circled words; invitations; and letters from constituents or lawmakers on the Hill, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.
“I had a letter from Schumer — he tore it up,” he said. “It was the craziest thing ever. He ripped papers into tiny pieces.”
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/10/trump-papers-filing-system-635164
Или, например, съесть.
In early 2017, Manigault Newman says, she walked Michael Cohen, then Trump’s personal attorney, into the Oval Office for a meeting with Trump — and allegedly saw the president chewing up a piece of paper while Cohen was leaving the office. Another White House official confirmed that Manigault Newman brought Cohen into the White House and was later rebuked for it. The two remain in contact, according to people familiar with the relationship.
“I saw him put a note in his mouth,” she writes in her book. “Since Trump was ever the germaphobe, I was shocked he appeared to be chewing and swallowing the paper. It must have been something very, very sensitive.”
https://yakov-a-jerkov.livejournal.com/1657050.html?thread=60047322#t60047322
no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 08:35 pm (UTC)"Outrage Culture" - то же самое.
С точки зрения проекции характерно, что рьяные борцы с политкорректостью, которые высмеивают "нежных снежинок" (snowflakes) с их притворным возмущением политически некорректными высказываниями, на практике оказываются нежными и ранимыми существами, которых болезненно задевают неосторожные высказывания в их адрес.
https://yakov-a-jerkov.livejournal.com/1709858.html?thread=62675234#t62675234
no subject
Date: 2020-02-08 03:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 08:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-02-07 08:10 pm (UTC)Объяснение Пелоси:
Q: You often counsel Members to be dignified in their response, to take the high ground? Did you step on that message by tearing up the speech?
Speaker Pelosi: No, I did not. I tore up a manifesto of mistruths. It is very hard for us to get you to talk about the issues we are working on: H.R. 3, infrastructure and the rest. He misrepresented all of that. It was necessary to get the attention of the American people to say, ‘This is not true, and this is how it affects you.’ And I don't need any lessons from anybody, especially the President of the United States, about dignity – dignity. Is it okay to start saying ‘four more years’ in the House of Representatives? It’s just unheard of. It is unheard of for the President to insult people there who don't share his views, as well as to misrepresent – present falsehoods. Some would use the word lie – I don’t like to use the word lie – about what he is saying.
So, no, I think it was completely, entirely appropriate. And considering some of the other exuberances within me, the courteous thing to do.
https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/2620-0